OwenGregorian
Politics • Science & Tech • Education
Cancer risk declines in old age, research helps explain why | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
December 07, 2024
post photo preview

When it comes to cancer, aging is a double-edged sword, researchers are increasingly learning.

Age is considered the most important risk factor for cancer. That's because genetic mutations build up in cells over years and decades, and ultimately drive the development of cancer.

Now a study from researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) and their collaborators provides new evidence about how advanced age can also be protective against cancer. The study, conducted in a mouse model of lung cancer, was published in Nature on December 4.

"We know that as people get older, they're more likely to get cancer," says study first author Xueqian Zhuang, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in the lab of senior study author Tuomas Tammela, PhD, at MSK's Sloan Kettering Institute. "But there's still a lot that's unknown about how aging actually changes the biology of cancer."

As with many types of cancer, lung cancer is diagnosed in most people around age 70, Dr. Zhuang says. But once you get to 80 or 85, the incidence rate starts to come down again.

"Our research helps show why," she adds. "Aging cells lose their capacity for renewal and therefore for the runaway growth that happens in cancer."

Overall, the findings have two key implications, the researchers say:

- First, they point to the underappreciated role that iron plays in aging cells' ability to regenerate -- suggesting that therapies that target iron metabolism may work better in younger people than older ones.

- Second, they underline the potential value of early intervention and prevention efforts, targeting the window when most cancers initiate.

Cells' Ability to Regenerate Linked to Iron Metabolism

To investigate why cancer incidence peaks in the early senior years and then starts to decline again, the MSK research team studied a genetically modified mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma, a common type of lung cancer that accounts for about 7% of all cancer deaths worldwide.

One of the things that makes it challenging to study aging in laboratory models is that mice take two years to develop to an age that's equivalent to 65-70 years in people, making experiments a lengthy and resource-intensive proposition.

But for the MSK researchers, the effort was worth it.

The scientists found that as the mice get older, they make more of a protein called NUPR1. More NUPR1 makes the cells in the lungs function as if they are iron deficient.

"The aging cells actually have more iron, but for reasons we don't yet fully understand, they function like they don't have enough," Dr. Zhuang says.

Since the cells in the older mice functioned as though they didn't have enough iron, they lost some of their ability to regenerate. And because that regenerative capacity is directly linked to the rise of cancer, the older mice developed far fewer tumors than their younger counterparts.

Intriguingly, this effect could be reversed by giving the older mice additional iron or by reducing the amount of NUPR1 in their cells.

"We think this discovery may have some immediate potential to help people," Dr. Tammela says. "Right now, millions of people, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic, live with insufficient lung function because their lungs didn't fully heal from an infection, or for some other reason. Our experiments in mice showed that giving iron can help the lungs regenerate, and we have really good ways of delivering drugs directly to the lungs -- like asthma inhalers."

But this is also where the double-edged nature of the discovery comes into play. By restoring the ability of the cells in the lungs to regenerate, one is also increasing the tissue's ability to develop cancer, the study showed.

"So this type of approach might not be appropriate for people who are at a high risk of developing cancer," he adds.

Older and Younger Patients May Respond Differently to Treatments That Target Iron Metabolism

The team's findings also have important implications for therapies based on a type of cell death called ferroptosis, which is triggered by iron. Ferroptosis was discovered in 2012, and there are a number of ferroptosis-inducing small molecule compounds, as well as drugs previously approved by the FDA, that are being investigated for their potential to kill cancer cells.

Older cells are far more resistant to ferroptosis than younger cells because they function as if they don't have enough iron, the researchers found. This means treatments that target ferroptosis may not be as effective in older patients as they are in younger ones.

"One of the things that we showed exploring all of this iron biology is that ferroptosis is tumor suppressive, as everybody suspected -- but much more profoundly in younger animals," Dr. Tammela says.

Dr. Zhuang adds: "To us, this says that because the biology of cells changes with aging, the sensitivity to drugs also changes. So doctors might need to really be careful in clinical trials, for example, to look at the effects in both older and younger patients."

And for Dr. Tammela, the research ultimately has an even bigger takeaway.

"What our data suggests in terms of cancer prevention is that the events that occur when we're young are probably much more dangerous than the events that occur later," he says. "So, preventing young people from smoking, or from tanning, or from other obvious carcinogenic exposures are probably even more important than we thought."

https://www.mskcc.org/news/cancer-risk-declines-in-old-age-new-msk-research-helps-explain-why

 

 

community logo
Join the OwenGregorian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Over 100 Navy SEALS Set to Descend on Washington D.C. in Explosive Show of Support for Army Veteran Pete Hegseth | The Gateway Pundit

Washington, D.C., is bracing for an unprecedented show of support as over 100 Navy SEALs prepare to descend on the nation’s capital, standing in solidarity with President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.

Hegseth, a decorated Army combat veteran and prominent conservative voice, has faced relentless media attacks in recent weeks.

The fake news media have leveled accusations ranging from outdated and disproven sexual misconduct claims to allegations of public drunkenness and financial mismanagement during his tenure at Concerned Veterans for America (CVA).

Critics on the right are pushing back hard against what they view as a deliberate effort to derail a nominee poised to shake up the Defense Department.

Randy Lair, a trustee at CVA, categorically denied the whistleblower allegations, describing them as “sensational fabrications designed to undermine a patriot.”

In an exclusive letter to the New York Post, Lair emphasized that Hegseth left CVA on good ...

00:01:07
‘Charlatan’ Vaccine Promoter Dr. Peter Hotez Says Multiple Viruses Will be Unleashed on America the Day After Trump Takes Office | Cristina Laila, The Gateway Pundit

‘Charlatan’ vaccine promoter Dr. Peter Hotez said multiple viruses will be unleashed on America one day after Trump is inaugurated next month.

“We have some big picture stuff coming down the pike starting on January 21st,” Hotez said to MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace before rattling off a list of viruses:

  • Bird flu
  • New Coronavirus
  • SARS
  • Mosquito-transmitted viruses
  • Dengue
  • Zika
  • Oropouche virus
  • Yellow fever
  • Pertussis/Whooping cough
  • Measles
  • Polio

Of course, Dr. Hotez failed to mention the measles outbreaks and Polio cases are primarily a problem with the illegal migrants invading the US.

Dr. Peter Hotez previously made headlines for refusing to debate author, activist, then-presidential candidate, attorney and now Trump’s nominee for HHS, Robert Kennedy, Jr., on the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Rather than accept the challenge, Hotez lashed out at both Robert Kennedy Jr. and Joe Rogan, who invited the two to debate the facts on his show.

Hotez refused and ...

00:01:30
Mysterious 'Car-Sized Drones' Over New Jersey Prompt FBI Investigation | ZeroHedge

Several weeks of mysterious drone swarms over the skies of one New Jersey county near the military research and manufacturing facility Picatinny Arsenal have sparked concerns among residents and prompted an FBI investigation.

"It's kind of unsettling," Mike Walsh, a Morris County resident who has spotted the drones on numerous occasions, told local media outlet PIX11 News.

He said some drones "are very big, probably the size of a car."

Since Nov. 18, Walsh and many other residents have spotted these drones in the night sky.

"They're kind of go slow," he said, adding, "They come towards you. Then they change direction a little. They're all going different ways."

We first detailed the story on Nov. 19 in a note titled "Spy Drones? "Unusual Activity" Reported Over Morris County, New Jersey, Near Military Research Facility."

The potential national security threat piqued our interest, considering multiple reports that the mysterious drones were observed near Picatinny Arsenal.

PIX11 News said...

00:02:18
Coffee With Scott Adams Afterparty X Spaces - 2/22/25

You are invited to join the next CWSA Afterparty X Spaces, today after Scott’s morning livestream!

https://x.com/owengregorian/status/1893281334623125857?s=46&t=za1kQOtu4Dod6Yb1P465eg

Coffee With Scott Adams Afterparty Spaces - 2/15/25

The next CWSA Afterparty X Spaces is today, and you’re invited!

As usual we’ll start a few minutes after Scott’s morning livestream ends.

https://x.com/owengregorian/status/1890748504206696532?s=46&t=za1kQOtu4Dod6Yb1P465eg

hey Greg, I like that you are doing a regular show and I don't want to criticize because that's what it's going to sound like so I'm going to start with that. I think you're doing a great job finding stories and exposing all kinds of science that we would never be exposed to otherwise.

but

it's really hard to get into a show when it's just a constant echo chamber. what I would like to see is if you could offer like people to raise their hands if they have the counter argument or a counterpoint to what we just heard. ... they talk a lot about wanting to get the people on either side to look at our point of views and they aren't going to listen to people who don't present their arguments. I think you'll grab a wider audience and it'll be much more interesting

post photo preview
I played a small part in making some news here.

This story focuses on Elon Musk of course, as the news tends to focus on every X post or reply he makes.

If you read this story, you may have noticed that it quotes Scott Adams' reaction to a previous story about the idea of issuing $5,000 "DOGE dividend" checks, questioning why we would do that when we are facing such massive budget deficits and an enormous national debt. Elon responded to that stating that he thought we needed to balance the budget first.

 

 

This isn't the only story written about this.

What it doesn't state is that my post about the $5,000 DOGE check idea is what prompted this whole conversation. 😎

https://x.com/OwenGregorian/status/1892184391717384462

It's also notable that the whole thing started with an X post from James Fishback (@j_fishback) that included a letter he wrote with a detailed proposal about the idea:

https://x.com/j_fishback/status/1891933120313663493

It's still a trip to think that an ordinary person like me can have even a small impact on the national conversation.

Don't underestimate the influence what you do on this platform could have. And thank you for your support, and for coming along this strange journey with me.

Read full Article
post photo preview
4th Generation Information Warfare

John Boyd and William S. Lind changed our understanding of modern warfare, and their ideas can help you in business, politics, influencing people, and lots more.

John Boyd was a fighter pilot in the US Air Force, and later became a military strategist and advised the Pentagon. He wrote many essays on how the nature of warfare was changing and what we should do about it. William S. Lind wrote a book called The 4th Generation Warfare Handbook that included many of Boyd's ideas which has been influential to how we approach warfighting. 

I'm going to describe some of the key concepts and frameworks covered in that book, and how they can be applied to information warfare. I'm hoping you'll come away with enough understanding that you can notice when these techniques are being applied, judge how well various players are doing with them to help predict how a conflict will turn out, and be able to start practicing these techniques yourself.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Poll Shows Post-Election Crash in Public Tolerance for Illegal Migration | Neil Munro, Breitbart News

Just 10 percent of Americans oppose President Donald Trump’s promise to deport illegal migrants with criminal records, according to an Ipsos poll for the New York Times.

In contrast, 87 percent support the deportations strongly or “somewhat,” so providing a broad consensus for a national enforcement campaign.

And just 19 percent of Americans — fewer than one in five — strongly oppose “deporting all immigrants who are here illegally,” the Ipsos poll also showed. Fifty-six percent support the deportations strongly or somewhat.

The post-election collapse of tolerance for illegal migration was spotlighted Saturday when the newspaper posted its early-January poll of 2,128 citizens and residents that confirmed recent polling trends.

The broad shift in political opinion — dubbed a “preference cascade” by academics —  was likely caused when Trump’s campaign and November win showed Americans how many other Americans oppose migration.

The new numbers will help Trump and his deputies begin the careful, low-drama, and gradual removal of millions of wage-cutting, rent-spiking migrants from U.S. society.

A patient and popular enforcement campaign will also help shift the political attention to the even bigger impact of legal migration on Americans.

Already, the rising public demand for less legal migration was spotlighted over Christmas when Twitter erupted in a furious debate over white-collar migration via the H-1B visa program. That drama was ignored by the poll but is expected to rise as the nation draws closer to the 2026 election.

Pro-migration groups, however, hope the Trump enforcement is chaotic and rushed because any tactical mistakes will help their media allies paint the repatriations as cruel and counterproductive.

The newspaper’s coverage of the poll downplays the drama, saying:

Many Americans who otherwise dislike President-elect Donald J. Trump share his bleak assessment of the country’s problems and support some of his most contentious prescriptions to fix them, according to a new poll from The New York Times and Ipsos.

The new poll includes much evidence that GOP voters are leading Democrats away from their politically disastrous support for the quasi-open borders policies put in place by President Joe Biden’s pro-migration, Cuban-born border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas.

For example, only 16 percent of Democrats oppose the deportation of criminal migrants, and only 34 percent of Democrats now “strongly” oppose the deportation of “all immigrants [emphasis added] who are here illegally.”

Overall, 55 percent want all migrants to be deported, and 87 percent want crminal migrants to be deported.

These numbers — and the approaching 2026 midterm elections — help to explain why a critical share of Senate Democrats are expected on Monday to support the Laken Riley bill that would allow the detention of criminal migrants.

Similarly, 56 percent said the Mayorkas migration has caused more crime. Just 38 percent — including 63 percent of Democrats, said the migration “doesn’t have much impact on crime.”

The poll said that 41 percent of Americans, including 68 percent of GOP voters — say “immigrants today are a burden on our country because they take our jobs, housing and health care.” However, the “forced choice” question did not offer alternative answers, so it prodded 56 percent of respondents to say immigrants “strengthen our country because of their hard work and talents.”

There is much evidence that legal and illegal migration makes ordinary Americans poor and less productive.

Elsewhere in the poll, Ipsos asked if there were too many or too few legal migrants.

Thirty percent said too many, and just 24 percent said too few. But the plurality of 43 percent picked a middle option — “the right number” — likely because the respondents do not know that Biden’s deputies imported roughly one migrant for every American birth since 2021.

Read more:

https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2025/01/18/poll-shows-post-election-crash-in-public-tolerance-for-illegal-migration/

 

 

Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals