OwenGregorian
Politics • Science & Tech • Education
Do men find female genitalia attractive? Here’s what the research says | Eric W. Dolan, PsyPost
December 04, 2024
post photo preview

New research published in the International Journal of Sexual Health has found that men’s perceptions of female genitals are mostly positive but show considerable variation. While most men view female genitals in a favorable light, focusing more on functional aspects rather than appearance, a significant minority hold negative attitudes.

Existing research shows that women’s perceptions of their genitals are often shaped by sociocultural influences, including unrealistic ideals perpetuated by media and pornography. Negative genital self-image has been linked to lower sexual satisfaction, poorer sexual health, and an increased likelihood of considering cosmetic surgery.

However, research also suggests that a woman’s self-perception is influenced by her partner’s attitudes, with even passing negative comments potentially causing long-term harm to her self-esteem. Despite this, little is known about how men actually perceive female genitals or how these perceptions may impact their partners.

“We had done qualitative research with women about their genital self-image that found that even casual negative remarks from male partners could have a big impact on women. Hence, the need to investigate men’s attitudes towards female genitals as well as the link between those attitudes and genital feedback to partners,” said study author E. Sandra Byers, professor emerita at the University of New Brunswick.

For their study, the researchers recruited 212 self-identified heterosexual men aged 19 to 77, primarily from the United States, who had experience with female partners. Participants completed an online survey hosted on a crowdsourcing platform, ensuring anonymity and confidentiality.

The researchers found that men’s attitudes toward female genitals were generally positive, but there was significant variation across individuals. On average, participants rated their overall perceptions of female genitals as moderately positive, agreeing with statements such as, “Women’s genitals are beautiful” and “Women should feel proud of their genitals.”

However, this positivity was not universal. About one-fifth of participants reported negative views, indicating that a notable minority of men harbor unfavorable attitudes toward female genitals.

Another significant finding was the association between men’s attitudes and their behavior in sexual and relational contexts. Men who held positive views were more likely to engage in behaviors fostering intimacy and confidence in their female partners, such as providing positive verbal feedback about their genitals. Conversely, men with negative attitudes were more likely to provide critical feedback, though the overall frequency of negative feedback was low.

Men with more positive views also reported having a greater number of lifetime female sexual partners. Surprisingly, the researchers did not find a link between attitudes and the frequency of specific sexual activities, such as oral sex.

Men also underestimated women’s satisfaction with their own genitals. While previous research found that 82% of women reported being satisfied with their genitals, men estimated this figure to be only 62%. This gap may reflect societal messages portraying female dissatisfaction as the norm.

“Most, but not all, men who are attracted to women have positive (though not very positive) views of female genitals,” Byers told PsyPost. “Holding negative views likely reflects societal messages about female genitals and may influence not only men’s own but also their female partners’ sexual well-being.”

When evaluating the importance of 23 specific genital characteristics, men did not prioritize appearance as highly as functional and sensory aspects. The attributes rated most important included physical pleasure, smell, taste, tightness, and lubrication, suggesting that men focus more on functional experiences than aesthetic considerations, such as symmetry or labial size.

“Men did not identify any of 23 aspects of female genitals, including appearance, as particularly important to them,” Byers noted.

While some men undoubtedly value appearance, the overall findings suggest that functionality and sensory enjoyment are more central to men’s positive perceptions. This contrasts with societal messaging emphasizing “idealized” genital appearances and may reassure women concerned about aesthetic judgments.

The new findings align with a 2015 study of 1,847 men aged 18–80 across the United States, which found that most men did not have strong preferences for specific vulvar characteristics. Participants in the study rated images depicting small, medium, and large labia as attractive, neutral, or unattractive.

While small and medium labia were generally preferred over large labia, a significant portion of respondents (36%) remained neutral toward all three sizes. When directly asked about their preferences, over half (54%) indicated they had no preference regarding labial size. Furthermore, the majority (60%) reported that appearance did not affect their sexual pleasure.

Read more:

https://www.psypost.org/do-men-find-female-genitalia-attractive-heres-what-the-research-says/

 

 

community logo
Join the OwenGregorian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Over 100 Navy SEALS Set to Descend on Washington D.C. in Explosive Show of Support for Army Veteran Pete Hegseth | The Gateway Pundit

Washington, D.C., is bracing for an unprecedented show of support as over 100 Navy SEALs prepare to descend on the nation’s capital, standing in solidarity with President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.

Hegseth, a decorated Army combat veteran and prominent conservative voice, has faced relentless media attacks in recent weeks.

The fake news media have leveled accusations ranging from outdated and disproven sexual misconduct claims to allegations of public drunkenness and financial mismanagement during his tenure at Concerned Veterans for America (CVA).

Critics on the right are pushing back hard against what they view as a deliberate effort to derail a nominee poised to shake up the Defense Department.

Randy Lair, a trustee at CVA, categorically denied the whistleblower allegations, describing them as “sensational fabrications designed to undermine a patriot.”

In an exclusive letter to the New York Post, Lair emphasized that Hegseth left CVA on good ...

00:01:07
‘Charlatan’ Vaccine Promoter Dr. Peter Hotez Says Multiple Viruses Will be Unleashed on America the Day After Trump Takes Office | Cristina Laila, The Gateway Pundit

‘Charlatan’ vaccine promoter Dr. Peter Hotez said multiple viruses will be unleashed on America one day after Trump is inaugurated next month.

“We have some big picture stuff coming down the pike starting on January 21st,” Hotez said to MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace before rattling off a list of viruses:

  • Bird flu
  • New Coronavirus
  • SARS
  • Mosquito-transmitted viruses
  • Dengue
  • Zika
  • Oropouche virus
  • Yellow fever
  • Pertussis/Whooping cough
  • Measles
  • Polio

Of course, Dr. Hotez failed to mention the measles outbreaks and Polio cases are primarily a problem with the illegal migrants invading the US.

Dr. Peter Hotez previously made headlines for refusing to debate author, activist, then-presidential candidate, attorney and now Trump’s nominee for HHS, Robert Kennedy, Jr., on the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Rather than accept the challenge, Hotez lashed out at both Robert Kennedy Jr. and Joe Rogan, who invited the two to debate the facts on his show.

Hotez refused and ...

00:01:30
Mysterious 'Car-Sized Drones' Over New Jersey Prompt FBI Investigation | ZeroHedge

Several weeks of mysterious drone swarms over the skies of one New Jersey county near the military research and manufacturing facility Picatinny Arsenal have sparked concerns among residents and prompted an FBI investigation.

"It's kind of unsettling," Mike Walsh, a Morris County resident who has spotted the drones on numerous occasions, told local media outlet PIX11 News.

He said some drones "are very big, probably the size of a car."

Since Nov. 18, Walsh and many other residents have spotted these drones in the night sky.

"They're kind of go slow," he said, adding, "They come towards you. Then they change direction a little. They're all going different ways."

We first detailed the story on Nov. 19 in a note titled "Spy Drones? "Unusual Activity" Reported Over Morris County, New Jersey, Near Military Research Facility."

The potential national security threat piqued our interest, considering multiple reports that the mysterious drones were observed near Picatinny Arsenal.

PIX11 News said...

00:02:18
Coffee With Scott Adams Afterparty Spaces - 2/15/25

The next CWSA Afterparty X Spaces is today, and you’re invited!

As usual we’ll start a few minutes after Scott’s morning livestream ends.

https://x.com/owengregorian/status/1890748504206696532?s=46&t=za1kQOtu4Dod6Yb1P465eg

hey Greg, I like that you are doing a regular show and I don't want to criticize because that's what it's going to sound like so I'm going to start with that. I think you're doing a great job finding stories and exposing all kinds of science that we would never be exposed to otherwise.

but

it's really hard to get into a show when it's just a constant echo chamber. what I would like to see is if you could offer like people to raise their hands if they have the counter argument or a counterpoint to what we just heard. ... they talk a lot about wanting to get the people on either side to look at our point of views and they aren't going to listen to people who don't present their arguments. I think you'll grab a wider audience and it'll be much more interesting

February 12, 2025

Traveling with family this week. Haven’t seen my brother yet but he posts this. 🙄 It’s going to be a long week.

post photo preview
post photo preview
I played a small part in making some news here.

This story focuses on Elon Musk of course, as the news tends to focus on every X post or reply he makes.

If you read this story, you may have noticed that it quotes Scott Adams' reaction to a previous story about the idea of issuing $5,000 "DOGE dividend" checks, questioning why we would do that when we are facing such massive budget deficits and an enormous national debt. Elon responded to that stating that he thought we needed to balance the budget first.

 

 

This isn't the only story written about this.

What it doesn't state is that my post about the $5,000 DOGE check idea is what prompted this whole conversation. 😎

https://x.com/OwenGregorian/status/1892184391717384462

It's also notable that the whole thing started with an X post from James Fishback (@j_fishback) that included a letter he wrote with a detailed proposal about the idea:

https://x.com/j_fishback/status/1891933120313663493

It's still a trip to think that an ordinary person like me can have even a small impact on the national conversation.

Don't underestimate the influence what you do on this platform could have. And thank you for your support, and for coming along this strange journey with me.

Read full Article
post photo preview
4th Generation Information Warfare

John Boyd and William S. Lind changed our understanding of modern warfare, and their ideas can help you in business, politics, influencing people, and lots more.

John Boyd was a fighter pilot in the US Air Force, and later became a military strategist and advised the Pentagon. He wrote many essays on how the nature of warfare was changing and what we should do about it. William S. Lind wrote a book called The 4th Generation Warfare Handbook that included many of Boyd's ideas which has been influential to how we approach warfighting. 

I'm going to describe some of the key concepts and frameworks covered in that book, and how they can be applied to information warfare. I'm hoping you'll come away with enough understanding that you can notice when these techniques are being applied, judge how well various players are doing with them to help predict how a conflict will turn out, and be able to start practicing these techniques yourself.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Poll Shows Post-Election Crash in Public Tolerance for Illegal Migration | Neil Munro, Breitbart News

Just 10 percent of Americans oppose President Donald Trump’s promise to deport illegal migrants with criminal records, according to an Ipsos poll for the New York Times.

In contrast, 87 percent support the deportations strongly or “somewhat,” so providing a broad consensus for a national enforcement campaign.

And just 19 percent of Americans — fewer than one in five — strongly oppose “deporting all immigrants who are here illegally,” the Ipsos poll also showed. Fifty-six percent support the deportations strongly or somewhat.

The post-election collapse of tolerance for illegal migration was spotlighted Saturday when the newspaper posted its early-January poll of 2,128 citizens and residents that confirmed recent polling trends.

The broad shift in political opinion — dubbed a “preference cascade” by academics —  was likely caused when Trump’s campaign and November win showed Americans how many other Americans oppose migration.

The new numbers will help Trump and his deputies begin the careful, low-drama, and gradual removal of millions of wage-cutting, rent-spiking migrants from U.S. society.

A patient and popular enforcement campaign will also help shift the political attention to the even bigger impact of legal migration on Americans.

Already, the rising public demand for less legal migration was spotlighted over Christmas when Twitter erupted in a furious debate over white-collar migration via the H-1B visa program. That drama was ignored by the poll but is expected to rise as the nation draws closer to the 2026 election.

Pro-migration groups, however, hope the Trump enforcement is chaotic and rushed because any tactical mistakes will help their media allies paint the repatriations as cruel and counterproductive.

The newspaper’s coverage of the poll downplays the drama, saying:

Many Americans who otherwise dislike President-elect Donald J. Trump share his bleak assessment of the country’s problems and support some of his most contentious prescriptions to fix them, according to a new poll from The New York Times and Ipsos.

The new poll includes much evidence that GOP voters are leading Democrats away from their politically disastrous support for the quasi-open borders policies put in place by President Joe Biden’s pro-migration, Cuban-born border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas.

For example, only 16 percent of Democrats oppose the deportation of criminal migrants, and only 34 percent of Democrats now “strongly” oppose the deportation of “all immigrants [emphasis added] who are here illegally.”

Overall, 55 percent want all migrants to be deported, and 87 percent want crminal migrants to be deported.

These numbers — and the approaching 2026 midterm elections — help to explain why a critical share of Senate Democrats are expected on Monday to support the Laken Riley bill that would allow the detention of criminal migrants.

Similarly, 56 percent said the Mayorkas migration has caused more crime. Just 38 percent — including 63 percent of Democrats, said the migration “doesn’t have much impact on crime.”

The poll said that 41 percent of Americans, including 68 percent of GOP voters — say “immigrants today are a burden on our country because they take our jobs, housing and health care.” However, the “forced choice” question did not offer alternative answers, so it prodded 56 percent of respondents to say immigrants “strengthen our country because of their hard work and talents.”

There is much evidence that legal and illegal migration makes ordinary Americans poor and less productive.

Elsewhere in the poll, Ipsos asked if there were too many or too few legal migrants.

Thirty percent said too many, and just 24 percent said too few. But the plurality of 43 percent picked a middle option — “the right number” — likely because the respondents do not know that Biden’s deputies imported roughly one migrant for every American birth since 2021.

Read more:

https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2025/01/18/poll-shows-post-election-crash-in-public-tolerance-for-illegal-migration/

 

 

Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals